All the Evidence I need

Last week, I read an article on how scientists working at CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research, famous for the giant hadron collider) had stated that according to their findings, the universe should not exist as we know it. In a meticulously controlled environment, their hypothesis of how the universe came into being has so far been unsubstantiated.

When I first saw the headline, my immediate reaction was that this is further evidence that God created the universe. In reality the findings, or lack thereof, do not provide any proof that God did or did not create the universe. I firmly believe that we will never have proof, at least scientifically speaking, of how the universe came into being. The reason for this is quite simple – scientific proof involves repeatable experimentation and observation. There is, of course, no possible way for anyone to observe the beginnings of the universe. There is also no way to know what exact environment and circumstances were present at that time. Even if scientists could find a way that the universe may have come into being it would never be more than a theory because there is just no way to know for sure that is the way it happened.

That got me to thinking about my own beliefs. I believe that the Bible tells us that God made the world, but it doesn’t tell us how. The Genesis account reads more like a baseball boxscore than an instruction manual. You can read how things progressed and what happened when, but there is very little on how it was done; even when there is some description, it is an overview and vague. The focus of Genesis 1 is on the “who” not the “how”.

The Genesis account, in some ways, is similar to many ancient stories of how the universe came into being. I remember learning about an Aboriginal creation story when I was in grade school. My classmates all got a laugh (and then a lecture on respect from our teacher) out of the story of how the world was created on the back of a turtle. Origin stories have been passed down for generations and to the skeptic the Genesis account could be viewed in the same light.

So why do I believe the biblical account? What about it makes it so compelling that I stand firm on my belief without the proof that my curious mind demands in just about every other area of my life? Why do I come back to it after every doubt I have that it is true?

Maybe the best place to start is the Gospel of John. John states in chapter 20:30-31 that the purpose of his writing is that we may know that Jesus is the Messiah so that we may gain eternal life. John 1 starts at the beginning, or more accurately, before then. John declares that through Jesus, who is God, all things were made.

Of course, this is no more proof than the original account in Genesis, but it does give another piece of evidence. The Creation story written down by Moses is corroborated by John. John’s Gospel is corroborated by the other Gospel authors. Those writings fit together with the Old Testament writings of Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah and David; you see that they point to the fact that Jesus is who John declares Him to be. The evidence keeps mounting.

You could argue that I have only used one source, the Bible, for all the evidence. That is true, but remember, the Bible is not just one book by one author written over a short period of time. Every book can be looked at as a different source. The fact that they have been compiled into one is because together they tell the whole story. It is no different than having several witnesses in a court case. The more of them that give the same story, the more credence the story has. It is not like a jury would say, “well, all their testimonies seem to support each other; so, we really can’t trust any of them.”

There are also many outside sources that confirm the accounts of the Bible, from other ancient writings to recent archaeological finds. In other words, there is plenty of reason to believe the individual parts of the Bible on their own as well as part of a complete story.

Does this evidence meet the burden of proof? That is what each one of us has to decide for ourselves. For me? It does.

Scientists will continue to keep looking for how the universe was created, and along the way, they will make great discoveries of how magnificent and mysterious the creation is. My prayer is that in the searching they will give some thought to the question of who – and find the Creator.



Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “All the Evidence I need

  1. Doug

    Thanks Jason. I like your take on the who vs how question.
    Because as smart as mankind thinks he is we still can’t even figure out how many of the structures in antiquity were built. So instead of being so self magnifying and proud mankind should humble himself and admit that we don’t have all the answers and stand in awe of the maker or original power that began the universe and seek to work within its mastery not tear it apart to see how it was put together. At least in my attempts at rebuilding things that I’ve taken apart have not gone well; it’s always easier to disassemble than reassemble. But in those occasions I never thought that somehow the item built itself or that each piece didn’t serve a purpose; I always understood that if I had parts left over something was wrong and the item likely wouldn’t function properly and more than likely would end up in the dump.
    Hope I haven’t said too much.

  2. Doug, I love your perspective on this. You brought a different point of view and that is awesome. Everyone has their own journey and God speaks to us all differently. Thank you for your encouragement and always lifting me up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s